| Click on SIEPR Discussion paper number for abstract
and to download pdf file unless otherwise
noted |
|
Discussion
Papers
(arranged by author)
|
| A-C | D-H | I-L | M-Q
| R-S | T-Z |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-005
Two Centuries of American Macroeconomic Growth
From Exploitation of Resource Abundance to Knowledge-Driven Development
Moses Abramovitz, Paul A. David
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.99-3 (see Paper No. 01-005 new expanded version)
American Macroeconomic Growth in the Era of Knowledge-Based Progress:
The Long-Run Perspective
Moses Abramovitz, Paul A. David
August 1999
This chapter focuses on the nature of the macroeconomic growth
process that has characterized the United States experience, and
manifested itself in the changing pace sources of the rise real
output per capita in U.S. economy during the past two hundred years.
Our main interest is indeed, the twentieth century, but we believe
that its major characteristics and the nature of the underlying
forces at work are clearly seen in comparisons between the century
just past and the one that came before.
A key observation that emerges from the long-term quantitative
economic record is that the proximate sources of increases in real
gross domestic product per capita in the century between 1889 and
1989 were quite different from those which obtained during the first
one hundred years of American national experience. Baldly put, the
national economy moved from margin has become more and more dependent
upon the acquisition and exploitation of technological and organizational
knowledge.
|
SIEPR Discussion Paper No.
06-039
Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth:
Towards Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘STIG Systems’
Philippe Aghion, Paul A. David and Dominique Foray
July 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-009
Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘STIG Systems’:
Many Obstacles, but Some Ways Forward
Philippe Aghion, Paul A. David and Dominique Foray
October 2006
This paper has been replaced by a revised and expanded version, Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth:
Towards Linking Policy Research and Practice in ‘STIG Systems’ , 06-039 -- July 2007
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-045
Beyond the Market Advisory Committee: Proceedings from a Workshop held at Stanford University, January 15, 2008
Charles D. Kolstad, Oren Ahoobim, Nick Burger, Corbett Grainger, and Shaun McRae
April 2008 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-015
Asymmetric Responses of Local Expenditures to
Changes in Intergovernmental Grants
Jaime Calleja Alderete
January 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-030
A Solution Concept for Majority Rule in Dynamic Settings
James Andreoni and B. Douglas Bernheim
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-019
Understanding an Emergent Diversity of Corporate Governance
and Organizational Architecture: An Essentiality-Based Analysis
Masahiko Aoki and Gregory Jackson
October 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-018
Linking Economic and Social-Exchange Games: From the Community Norm to CSR
Masahiko Aoki
October 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-014
Whither Japan’s Corporate Governance?
Masahiko Aoki
March 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-013
Mechanisms of Endogenous Institutional Change
Masahiko Aoki
March 2006 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-003
Innovation in the Governance of Product-System
Innovation: The Silicon Valley Model
Masahiko Aoki
October 2000 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
488
Relational Financing as an Institution
and its Viability under Competition
Masahiko Aoki, Serdar Dinc
May 1997
This paper presents a new, generic definition
of relational financing that may cover a
wide range of financial practices in different
economies, ranging from the Japanese main
bank relationship, to bank lending to smaller
firms, and venture capital in the U.S. It
then discusses various incentives of the
financier to commit to relational financing
and reviews the recent literature on issues
about how those incentives are affected
by increasing competition. One useful insight
is that increasing competition is not necessarily
harmful to relational financing. It then
applies theoretical insights to problems
of institutional transition in two Asian
economies. It argues that the Japanese financial
system will retain some aspects of relational
financing even after the impending financial
deregulation, although there will be a significant
reduction in the bank's role in corporate
governance. Finally, it assesses that the
ongoing experiment of main bank relationship
in China may be one of viable financial
options for successful transition of the
planned economy to a market economy, but
cautions that more competition in the banking
sector is necessary for relational banking
to emerge as an institution.
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-041
In the Footsteps of Silicon Valley? Indian and Irish Software in the International Division of Labour
Ashish Arora, Alfonso Gambardella and Salvatore Torrisi
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-030
Voluntary Abatement and Market Value:
An Event Study Approach
Seema Arora
February 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-003
Debt Relief: What Do the Markets Think?
Peter Blair Henry and Serkan Arslanalp
November 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-025
Identification and Inference in Nonlinear
Difference-In-Differences Models
Susan Atheyand Guido W. Imbens
May 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-022
The Impact of Information Technology on Emergency
Health Care Outcomes
Susan Atheyand Scott Stern
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-042
Agglomeration and Growth: A Study of the Cambridge Hi-Tech Cluster
Suma S. Athreye
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-036
The Lovely but Lonely Vickrey Auction
Lawrence M. Ausubel and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-035
Ascending Proxy Auctions
Lawrence M. Ausubel and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-034
The Clock-Proxy Auction:
A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design
Lawrence M. Ausubel, Peter Cramton, and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-020
Package Bidding: Vickrey Vs Ascending Auctions
Paul Milgrom and Lawrence M. Ausubel
January 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-041
Auctions versus Negotiations in Procurement:
An Empirical Analysis
Patrick Bajari, Robert McMillan and Steven Tadelis
July 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-025
Incentive versus Transaction Costs: A
Theory of Procurement Contracts
Patrick Bajari and Steven Tadelis
June 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-024
Why Do Blacks Live in The Cities and Whites
Live in the Suburbs?
Patrick Bajari and Matthwe E. Kahn
Revised March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
99-023
Winner Curse, Reserve Prices and Endogenous
Entry: Empirical Insights from eBay Auctions
Patrick Bajari and Ali Hortacsu
March 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-028
CEO Compensation for Major US Companies in 2006
Samia El Baroudy, Ruth Levine and Ling Shao
January 2008 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-038
Growth in Industrial Clusters: A Bird’s Eye View of the United Kingdom
Catherine Beaudry and Peter Swan
March 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-031
A Solution Concept for Majority Rule in Dynamic Settings
B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel
December 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-030
A Solution Concept for Majority Rule in Dynamic Settings
James Andreoni and B. Douglas Bernheim
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-029
A Solution Concept for Majority Rule in Dynamic Settings
B. Douglas Bernheim and Sita Nataraj
May 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-041
How Much do Real Estate Brokers Add? A Case Study
B. Douglas Bernheim and Jonathan Meer
July 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-033
Behavioral Public Economics: Welfare and Policy Analysis with
Non-Standard Decision-Makers
B. Douglas Bernheim and Antonio Rangel
June 2005 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-22
Bequests as Signals: An Explanation
for the Equal Division Puzzle
B. Douglas Bernheim and Sergei
Sererinov
August 1999
In the United States, more than two-thirds
of decedents with multichild families divide
their estates exactly equally among their
children. In contrast, intra vivos gifts
are usually unequal. These findings challenge
the validity of existing theories regarding
the determination of intergenerational transfers.
In this paper, we develop a theory that
accounts for this puzzle, based on the notion
that the division of bequests provides a
signal about a parent’s altruistic preferences.
The theory can also explain the norm of
unigeniture, which prevails in other societies.
(JEL D10, H31)
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
491
What Accounts for the Variation in Retirement
Wealth among U.S. Households?
B. Douglas Bernheim, Jonathan
Skinner, Steven Weinberg
September 1997
Household survey data consistently depict
large variations in saving and wealth, even
among households with similar socio-economic
characteristics. Within the context of the
life cycle hypothesis, families with identical
lifetime resources might choose to accumulate
different levels of wealth for a variety
of reasons, including variation in time
preference rates, risk tolerance, exposure
to uncertainty, relative tastes for work
and leisure at advanced ages, income replacement
rates, and so forth. These factors can be
divided into a small number of classes,
each with a distinctive implication concerning
the relation between accumulated wealth
and the shape of the consumption profile.
By examining this relation empirically,
one can test for the presence or absence
of these particular explanations for differences
in wealth. Using the Panel Study of Income
Dynamics and the Consumer Expenditure Survey,
we find very little support for life cycle
models that rely on the above factors to
explain wealth variation. The data are,
however, consistent with "rule of thumb"
or "mental accounting" theories of wealth
accumulation.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
490
Education and Saving: The Long-Term Effects
of High School Financial Curriculum Mandates
B. Douglas Bernheim, Daniel
M. Garrett, Dean M. Maki
June 1997
Over the last forty years, the majority
of states have adopted consumer education
policies, and a sizable minority have specifically
mandated that high school students receive
instruction on topics related to household
financial decision-making (budgeting, credit
management, saving and investment, and so
forth). In this paper, we attempt to determine
whether the curricula arising from these
mandates have had any discernable effect
on adult decisions regarding saving. Using
a unique household survey, we exploit the
variation in requirements both across states
and over time to identify the effects of
interest. The evidence indicates that mandates
have significantly raised both exposure
to financial curricula and subsequent asset
accumulation once exposed students reached
adulthood. These effects appear to have
been gradual rather than immediate--a probable
reflection of implementation lags.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-1
Taxation and Saving
B. Douglas Bernheim
March 1999
In this survey, I summarize and evaluate
the extant literature concerning taxation
and personal saving. I describe the theoretical
models that economists have used to depict
savings decisions and I explore the positive
and normative implications of these models.
The central positive question is whether
and to what extent specific public policies
raise or lower the rate of saving. The central
normative question is whether and to what
extent it is desirable to tax the economic
returns to saving. I also examine empirical
evidence on the saving effects of various
tax policies. This evidence includes econometric
studies of the generic relation between
saving and the after-rate tax of return,
as well as the analyses of responses to
the economic incentives that are imbedded
in tax-deferred retirement accounts. Finally,
I also discuss several indirect channels
through which tax policy may affect household
saving by altering the behavior of third
parties, such as employers.
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-021
Uncertainty and the Dynamics of R&D
Nicholas Bloom
January 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-020
Do R&D tax credits work? Evidence from a panel of countries 1979–1997
Nicholas Bloom, Rachel Griffith and John Van Reenen
November 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-012
Generalized Solow-Neutral Technical Progress
and Postwar Economic Growth
Michael J. Boskin and Lawrence
J. Lau
November 2000 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-014
The Vickrey Lecture: From Edgeworth to
Vickrey To Mirrlees
Michael J. Boskin
October 1999
William Vickrey's Agenda for Progressive
Taxation is perhaps his best-known work.
It stands roughly half way between Edgeworth
and Mirrlees, both historically and intellectually.
Edgeworth argued that the optimal tax (and
transfer) system equalized incomes by taxing
above-average incomes at 100 percent and
transferring the proceeds to those below
average. Mirrlees argued optimality in the
presence of disincentive effects, which
Edgeworth ignored, placing severe limits
on high tax rates. Vickrey proposed 21 tax
reforms to make a practical system of personal
progressive taxation workable. The two most
famous were cumulative lifetime averaging
and decreasing power succession taxes. This
paper reviews the proposals in light of
subsequent intellectual and historical developments.
Many of the issues Vickrey explored are
relevant today whether the tax system is
flat or progressive and whether the base
is income or consumption.
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-15
Economic Measurement: Progress and Challenges
Michael J. Boskin
January 2000
The development of the concepts and measurements
of national income are among the most important
achievements of modern economics. However,
substantial improvements can and should
be made in the traditional domain of the
national accounts. The Commerce Departments
Bureau of Economic Analysis has made numerous
improvements in recent years, including
changing the focus from gross national product
(GNP) to gross domestic product (GDP), chain
weighting, using technically improved (Fisher
Ideal) price and output indexes, adopting
the system of national accounts (SNA) and
initiating work on a variety of satellite
accounts. In the postwar period, BEA has
responded to the large structural changes
in the economy, and the need for greater
detail and frequency of estimates. Additional
work should be done to improve measurement
in a number of areas: the growth of hard-to-measure
services, new products, quality improvements,
technology and innovation, time use, international
trade and capital flows, the impact of new
firms, financial innovations, changes in
the organization of production and distribution,
capital accounts and demography, to name
a few of the most important.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
06-043
Understanding the Increased Time to the Baccalaureate Degree
John Bound, Michael F. Lovenheim, and Sarah Turn
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-051
Network Effects and Microsoft
Timothy F. Bresnahan
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-050
The Economics of the Microsoft Case
Timothy F. Bresnahan
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-049
The Right Remedy
Timothy F. Bresnahan
August 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-043
“Old Economy” Inputs for “New Economy” Outcomes: Cluster Formation in the New SiliconValley
Timothy Bresnahan, Alfonso Gambardella, AnnaLee Saxenian and Scott Wallsten
June 2001 |
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No. 99-7
Local and Global Competition in Information
Technology
Timothy Bresnahan and John
Richards
June 1999
We examine the implications of changing
competitive dynamics in global information
and communications technology (ICT) markets
for government demand-steering policies
whose goal is local rents. Both computing
and telephony are undergoing changes in
global industry structure and changes in
the nature of competition. The convergence
of computing and telephony and the rapid
technological change (and accompanying technological
uncertainty) driving this convergence reinforce
trends toward vertical competition. The
emergence of global ICT markets lowers entry
barriers, likely encouraging government-
supported local entrants into global ICT
markets. There are, however, strongly offsetting
disadvantages. The underlying economics
of ICT markets under vertical competition
will work to reinforce the dominant position
of U.S.-based incumbents in many segments.
The prospects for exports, command of rent-related
standards, and large rents from exports
are not very bright. We expect to see far
more demand-steering attempts than successes.
Download this paper
(PDF).
|
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
98-5
Information Technology, Workplace Organization
and the Demand for Skilled Labor: Firm-level
Evidence
Timothy F. Bresnahan,
Erik Brynjolfsson and Lorin M. Hitt February
1999
Recently, the relative demand for skilled
labor has increased dramatically. We investigate
one of the causes, skilled-biased technical
change. Advances in information technology
(IT) are among the most powerful forces
bearing on the economy. Employers who use
IT often make complementary innovations
in their organizations and in the services
they offer. Our hypothesis is that these
co-inventions by IT users change the mix
of skills that employers demand. Specifically,
we test the hypothesis that is a cluster
of complementary changes involving IT, workplace
organization and services that is the key
skill-biased technical change. We examine
new firm-level data liking several indicators
of IT use, workplace organization, and the
demand for skilled labor. In both a short-run
factor demand framework and a production
function framework, we find evidence for
complementarity. IT use is complementary
to a new workplace organization which includes
broader job responsibilities for line workers,
more decentralized decision-making and more
self-managing teams. In turn, both IT and
that new organization are complements with
worker skill, measured in a variety of ways.
Further, the managers in our survey believe
that IT increases skill requirements and
autonomy among workers in their firms. Taken
together, the results highlight the roles
of both IT and Itenabled organizational
change as important components of the skill-biased
technical change.
|
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-005
Longevity-Insured Retirement Distributions
from Pension Plans: Market and Regulatory
Issues
Jeffrey R. Brown and Mark J.
Warshawsky
November 2000 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-014
Trading Costs and Home Bias:
Evaluating a Proposal for Resolving
the Feldstein-Horioka Puzzle
Sean Buckley
September 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-047
Pricing and Welfare in Health Plan Choice
M. Kate Bundorf, Jonathan Levin and Neale Mahoney
June 2008 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-045
Beyond the Market Advisory Committee: Proceedings from a Workshop held at Stanford University, January 15, 2008
Charles D. Kolstad, Oren Ahoobim, Nick Burger, Corbett Grainger, and Shaun McRae
April 2008 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-007
Accounting for Stock Options
Jeremy Bulow and John B. Shoven
March 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-006
Matching and Price Competition
Jeremy Bulow and Jonathan Levin
December 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
05-011
Digital Information Network Technologies, Organizational Performance and Productivity
Alexandre Caldas, Paul A. David, and Orges Ormanidhi
December 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-013
Social Influences and the Private Provision of Public Goods:
Evidence from Charitable Contributions in the Workplace
Katherine Grace Carman
January 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
00-040
Israel’s Silicon Wadi: The Forces Behind Cluster Formation
Catherine de Fontenay and Erran Carmel
June 2001 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No
04-032
Production Targets
Guillermo Caruana and Liran Einav
June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-035
A Theory of Endogenous Commitment
Guillermo Caruana and Liran Einav
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-035
A Theory of Endogenous Commitment
Guillermo Caruana and Liran Einav
February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-012
Bargaining in the Shadow of the Law:
How Effective are International Intellectual
Property Laws? Evidence from Patenting
Decisions in Agricultural Biotechnology
Phoebe Chan
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-026
The Productivity Surge of the Nineties and Future Growth
Robert M. Coen and Bert G. Hickman
May 2002 - Revised February 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No
04-031
Estimating Risk Preferences from Deductible Choice
Alma Cohen and Liran Einav
June 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-032
On the Optimal Progressivity of the Income Tax Code
Dirk Krueger and Juan Carlos Conesa
June 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
07-005
Firm-Specific Information and the Efficiency of Investment
Anusha Chari and Peter Blair Henry
August 2007 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-004
Risk Sharing and Asset Prices: Evidence From a Natural Experiment
Anusha Chari and Peter Blair Henry
October 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
02-002
Capital Account Liberalization: Allocative Efficiency or Animal Spirits?
Anusha Chari and Peter Blair Henry
April 2002 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
04-023
Expectations, Bond Yields and Monetary Policy
Albert Lee Chun
May 2005 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-033
Order Without Law? Property
Rights During the California Gold Rush
Karen Clay and Gavin Wright
May 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-021
Fifty Years Of Economic Growth In
Western Europe: No Longer Catching Up
But Falling Behind?
Nicholas Crafts
November 2003 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
03-034
The Clock-Proxy Auction:
A Practical Combinatorial Auction Design
Lawrence M. Ausubel, Peter Cramton, and Paul Milgrom
August 2004 |
SIEPR Discussion paper No.
01-010
Not Invented Here: What Can be Learned From Elsewhere About Restructuring Electricity Markets
Robert Thomas Crow
December 2001 |
| A-C | D-H | I-L | M-Q
| R-S | T-Z |